03 · REVIEW

Performance Report

Outcome first. Evidence on demand. The ride is already recorded. Review explains why it happened, what limited or unlocked performance, and the one thing to take into the next session.

Loading session evidence…
01 · OUTCOME

What did this ride actually produce?

Actual first. Session opportunity and target second. No graph reading required.

Choose a session by date, beach and best recorded jump.
Optional target comparison
Sets the benchmark used across the performance envelope.

This target changes the goal benchmark in the envelope graphs. Recorded jump heights stay the same.

COMPARISON TARGET20.0 mLong-term big-air goal
SESSION BEST—Recorded WOO height
JUMP MECHANICS MAP · SELECTED JUMP

How this jump was built and what it produced

Edge, pop, pop velocity, height, airtime and distance mapped into one jump story.

MeasuredDerivedModelled
Session loading…
Preparing jump mechanics…
JUMP METRICS COMPARISONSelected jump against your personal strong-jump band. The 20 m goal is only shown where the target is directly defensible.
Selected jumpStrong-jump band20 m goal
COACH INTERPRETATIONOne read. One next action.

Waiting for selected jump evidence…

Evidence discipline: Edge, pop, pop velocity, height, airtime and landing come from the recorded jump. Distance is shown only when GPS/jump-distance evidence exists. The motion sequence is a schematic explanation of those measurements, not video reconstruction.
SESSION PHYSICS · WHY THE HEIGHT HAPPENED

Opportunity. Execution. Result.

One visual chain joining the conditions, approach, aerodynamic opportunity, release and flight.

MeasuredDerivedModelled
APPARENT WIND—Needs mapped wind + approach speed
LOAD POTENTIAL—qA ÷ rider weight · not line tension
OPPORTUNITY HEIGHT—Uses the report's existing opportunity model
EXECUTION DELTA—Actual height minus opportunity height
FLIGHT SUPPORT—Best jump airtime vs ballistic equivalent
01 · CONDITIONSWind —Timestamp-matched historical wind
02 · APPROACHSpeed —Take-off / GPS evidence
03 · LOADPotential —Aerodynamic loading proxy
04 · RELEASEPop —Edge + pop + pop velocity
05 · FLIGHTHeight —Height + airtime
06 · CONTROLLanding —Landing G
AERODYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP

Apparent wind × jump height

Every mapped jump in the selected ride. This shows association, not causation.

RELATIONSHIP—
MAPPED JUMPS—
Waiting for timestamp-matched wind and approach speed.
IQ
PHYSICS COACH SYNTHESISWaiting for session evidence…

Coach will separate a lack of opportunity from a failure to convert good opportunity before recommending a technical change.

What do these metrics mean?
DerivedApparent Wind ProxyTrue wind combined with board speed. Full vector when travel bearing exists; clearly labelled proxy otherwise.
DerivedLoad PotentialDynamic pressure × kite area ÷ rider weight. Available loading only; not measured line tension.
ModelledOpportunity HeightThe report's existing saved pre-ride opportunity estimate, or its explicitly labelled personal-envelope fallback.
ModelledExecution DeltaActual minus opportunity. It tells Coach whether the result mainly reflects conditions or conversion.
DerivedFlight Support RatioActual airtime relative to a same-height ballistic arc. It describes flight support without pretending to measure kite lift directly.
ACTUAL—Selected ride
SESSION OPPORTUNITY—Evidence-backed opportunity
GOAL GAP—To selected target
OUTCOME READ

Reading the gaps…

LATEST SESSION BEST—Most recent recorded ride
2026 PB—Highest recorded 2026 jump
LIFETIME WOO PB—Historical verified WOO PB
02 · WHY

Reading your ride…

I’m joining your WOO evidence, conditions and goal into one clear coaching call.

CONFIDENCE—Evidence strength
COACH READ—
WHY IT MATTERED—
WHAT HELD YOU BACK—
WHAT YOU NAILED—
NEXT RIDE FOCUS—
ON-WATER TEST—
CLOSE THE LOOPTake this cue straight into your next ride plan.
NEXT RIDE → PLAN
KEY LIMITER

Reading the largest gap…

03 · EVIDENCE

What supports the coaching call?

Current-session evidence stays visible. Methodology and long-term sector analysis are collapsed until you ask for them.

Current-session evidence first. Deeper model and historical evidence are available below.
CONDITIONS VS RIDING · WIND × HEIGHT

Did more wind produce more height?

Select a recorded session and Coach maps each timed WOO jump to the BeachStats observations already captured by the 10-minute collector. A current BeachStats outage does not invalidate stored history; no fallback weather is ever substituted.

PEARSON r—Waiting for mapped evidence
MAPPED JUMPS—No source mapped
WIND RANGE—BeachStats observed/interpolated wind
SESSION STORY · WIND VS JUMP HEIGHT

Did the wind change explain your jump height?

Wind and jump height on one shared timeline. The purpose is simple: did changing wind actually track changing jump height?

PERFORMANCE ENVELOPE

How close are you to your current performance envelope?

Each row shows what you achieved, what the ride gave you, and the selected goal. Landing is normalised correctly: lower G is better.

EVIDENCE STRENGTH

How stable is the signal?

Recent-session movement and the source behind the opportunity estimate. This tells you how much weight to put on the conclusion.

DEEP DIVE · MODEL & METHODMetrics, context, geometry and evidence method
ACHIEVED · OPPORTUNITY · GOAL

Each metric keeps its real measurement. The bar shows achieved performance, the orange marker shows the session reference, and the goal line is the selected target.

RIDE CONTEXT

What did the conditions actually give you?

The session reference uses the saved pre-ride prediction where it exists. Rider, equipment, wind, water and tack geometry stay separate so Coach can explain the gap without pretending every session offered the same ceiling.

STANCE · WIND · SPEED

Reading tack and wind geometry…

THE MODEL

Conditions → Achieved → Next target.

EVIDENCE & METHOD

What is measured, what is derived, and what is still a hypothesis.

WOO Big Air measurement

WOO measures board-level jump height, airtime and landing G-force. WOO + smartwatch adds GPS context such as speed and jump distance.

WOO measurement documentation ↗
Take-off and landing tell different stories

Published kitesurfing research shows that height, airtime, take-off load and landing impact are related but they do not tell the same story. Coach therefore keeps boost performance and landing control separate.

Load analysis study ↗
Tack and wind geometry

Goofy/regular stance × wind side is a BTE Coach hypothesis. It is displayed and tested against approach speed, jump distance and matched sessions; it does not become a fixed performance penalty without evidence.

LONGER-TERM CONDITIONSHistorical wind × height by tack sector
LONGER-TERM CONDITIONS · HISTORICAL CLASSIFIED SESSIONS

Historical wind-at-jump × height · split by tack sector

Coach uses each session’s recorded wind direction to place it into your normal tack sector, then maps each WOO jump time to persisted BeachStats wind speed. This avoids guessing tack from GPS and avoids using the suspect BeachStats direction field.

BARASSIEWind speed × WOO height
Building evidence
SECTOR A · SW–WSECTOR B · WNW–N
TROON SOUTHWind speed × WOO height
Building evidence
SECTOR A · S–WSECTOR B · WNW–NW
Sector rule: the sector comes from the session’s recorded/forecast wind-from direction, not from BeachStats direction. BeachStats supplies the timestamp-matched wind speed only. Sessions without a trustworthy recorded wind direction stay unclassified rather than being guessed.
04 · NEXT RIDETurn the evidence into one controlled change.
NEXT RIDE → PLANVIEW PROGRESS